Search:

Home | Arts | Art Education


"Environmental" Group Supports and Encourages Generation of Toxic Hazardous Waste

By: Aaron R Daniel

The organization is totally hypocritical as the people who run the web site drive around in their cars made of newly mined "dirty" iron, zinc, copper, etc. You know they all live in houses plumbed with "dirty" copper pipe, their houses are also wired with copper, they drive cars wired with copper, use computers and cell phones wired with copper, etc. "Dirty" platinum and palladium reduces the smog emissions of the "dirty" gasoline they burn to run their dirty cars. They use the very "dirty" gold and silver they condemn within the contacts of all their electronic devices. Not just their phones and TVs, but the terribly computers they use to form their web site to bash the mining industry contains that same "dirty" gold they are condemning, and telling you not to use! They love their nice luxurious electrically enhanced lives, and thus are hypocrites to the extreme. "No Dirty Gold" is not the sole one of those scammers. There are others like "Nice Basin Mine Watch", a phony organization located right here in my hometown of Reno. All of these anti-mining organizations use the terribly products they condemn. It's sort of a bunch of crack addicts holding a protest against crack makers, after they are those who purchase the product and keep the makers in business. Just a lot of examples of "better than you" varieties of groups that do for themselves precisely what they preach that you shouldn't do!
The massive "issue" that is promoted at "no dirty gold" is the utilization of recycled gold. They imply that since recycled gold is already out of the ground, it's thus somehow a lot of environmentally friendly. Most recycled gold is recovered from computers and different electronics parts. The lie they don't tell you is that the method of recycling gold involves the employment of sturdy acids (creating hazardous wastes) and incineration of plastic electronic elements (making serious air pollution emissions and even more toxic waste). Environmentally speaking, recycled gold is most likely WORSE than newly mined gold as so much as pollution created per ounce of gold. So in the end they very are encouraging and supporting the generation of increased amounts of toxic waste. Is there any validity to their claim that recycled gold is somehow environmentally higher than newly mined gold? After all not! However they have to keep up the lie thus the money continues flowing into their coffers.
One amongst nodirtygold's chief targets is Couer 'Alene Mines. I've got frolicked at a Couer mine here in Nevada - and grasp it to be a clean operation. Yet this can be one in every of the businesses repeatedly attacked by "no dirty gold" on their internet site. The Couer mine I have visited is their silver and gold mine at Rochester in Nevada. That mine is very regulated and very clean. I have been there head to head to see it. The parents within the nearby city are glad to own them in their county - for several years it's been the county's largest business and their taxes pay a considerable portion of the county budget. The environmental impacts from that mine beyond their property boundary are close to zero. Thus don't let an extremist web site full of baloney, that provides few if any facts to support their allegations convince you somehow that all newly mined gold and silver are somehow "dirty". The facts just don't support the charge.
The truth is that mining firms are subject to thousands upon thousands of laws limiting their effects on the environment. These firms should get and hold dozens of permits governing the impacts their operations. Here in the US, they need to pay the govt. beforehand for the value for the reclamation for any land disturbed by their operations. They have to pay for their own reclamation before they even flip their 1st shovel stuffed with dirt. Mining is one of the foremost heavily regulated businesses out there. Yes, a century ago, miners created some serious environmental impacts. However this is often not 1877, and things have changed. We have a tendency to have the EPA, BLM, MSHA and several other Federal, State and local government agencies to constantly regulate and minimize the impacts of their operations.
Another necessary purpose concerning all these groups who oppose all mining within the US is that their efforts are actually increasing pollution in little developing nations populated principally by minorities. The gold, copper and alternative resources have to return from somewhere, so it gets mined in Bolivia, or Namibia or someplace like that. These countries are poorly prepared to control the mines there and consequently, more pollution is created than per pound of metal mined than there would be if it were simply mined here. Assume regarding it - there's really more pollution created on a worldwide basis than if those resources were mined merely here and used here because of our sturdy environmental laws. Supporting mining in the USA really reduces worldwide pollution. The "not in my backyard" perspective promoted by these teams is actually a terribly selfish and self-focused one.
Therefore do not buy the baloney, do not fall for the lie, do not drink the Kool-Aid! If you would like to convey some cash to form the world a better place, realize the local homeless shelter in your community. Most of those operations create highly efficient use of donated money to help those who are down and out. Any cash donated to "no dirty gold" is wasted and accomplishes nothing of significance.

Article Source: http://www.gambling-articles.org

Link : Chuck Carter has been writing articles online for nearly 2 years now. Not only does this author specialize in Environmental, you can also check out his latest website about: High Back Office Chair Which reviews and lists the best high back ergonomic chair

Please Rate this Article

 

Not yet Rated

Click the XML Icon Above to Receive Art Education Articles Via RSS!

Powered by Article Dashboard